Permalien Courriel Export
The governance gap : extractive industries, human rights, and the home state advantage
Éditeur Routledge
Année 2014
Notices liées
Notice détaillée
The governance gap : extractive industries, human rights, and the home state advantage
Données textuelles
Autre support
The governance gap extractive industries, human rights, and the home state advantage 2014
Description d’après la consultation du 20-07-2018
Titre provenant de l'écran-titre
L'impression du document génère 461 p.
L'accès à cette ressource est réservée aux usagers des établissements qui en ont fait l'acquisition
Bibliogr. Index
Navigateur internet ; lecteur de fichier PDF
Classification Dewey
1. Introduction ; 2. Talisman in Sudan ; 3. The Governance Gap: Multistakeholder and intergovernmental initiatives ; 4. The Governance Gap: Domestic laws and other governance mechanisms ; 5. Extractive Industries, Human Rights and the Home State Advantage
La page de garde indique : "This book explores the persistence of the governance gap with respect to the human rights-impacting conduct of transnational extractive corporations operating in zones of weak governance.The authors launch their account with a fascinating case study of Talisman Energy’s experience in Sudan, informed by their own experience as members of the 1999 Canadian Assessment Mission to Sudan (Harker Mission). Drawing on new governance, reflexive law and responsive law theories, the authors assess legal and other non-binding governance mechanisms that have emerged since that time, including the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. They conclude that such mechanisms are incapable of systematically preventing human rights violating behaviour by transnational corporations, or of assuring accountability of these actors or recompense for victims of such violations. The authors contend that home state regulation, while not a silver bullet, has a crucial role to play in regulating such conduct. They pick up where UN Special Representative John Ruggie’s Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights left off, and propose an innovative, robust and adaptable template for strengthening the regulatory framework of home states. Their model draws insights from the theoretical literature, leverages existing public, private, transnational, national, ‘soft’ and hard regulatory tools, and harnesses the specific strengths of state-based governance."
Origine de la notice
Abes (SUDOC)

inMedia v4.4