Permalien Courriel Export
Reconsidering the American way of war : US military practice from the Revolution to Afghanistan
Éditeur Georgetown University Press
Année 2014
Notices liées
Notice détaillée
Reconsidering the American way of war : US military practice from the Revolution to Afghanistan
Données textuelles
Autre support
Reconsidering the American way of war US military practice from the Revolution to Afghanistan cop. 2014
L'impression du document génère 415 pages
Description d'après la consultation, 2018-05-17
Titre provenant de l'écran-titre
L'accès à cette ressource est réservé aux usagers des établissements qui en ont fait l'acquisition
Bibliographie. Index
Navigateur internet ; lecteur de fichier PDF
Classification Dewey
355.033 573
Preludes ; American ways of war: turns in interpretation ; American strategic culture: an elusive fiction ; American military art: a misleading analogy ; American military practice: ; The Revolutionary War to the Mexican War ; The Civil War to the Boxer Rebellion ; The Caribbean Wars to the Korean War ; The Guatemalan Coup to the War on Terrororism ; Conclusions and observations
Challenging several longstanding notions about the American way of war, this book examines US strategic and operational practice from 1775 to 2014. It surveys all major US wars from the War of Independence to the campaigns in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as most smaller US conflicts to determine what patterns, if any, existed in American uses of force. Contrary to many popular sentiments, Echevarria finds that the American way of war is not astrategic, apolitical, or defined by the use of overwhelming force. Instead, the American way of war was driven more by political considerations than military ones, and the amount of force employed was rarely overwhelming or decisive. As a scholar of Clausewitz, Echevarria borrows explicitly from the Prussian to describe the American way of war not only as an extension of US policy by other means, but also the continuation of US politics by those means. The book’s focus on strategic and operational practice closes the gap between critiques of American strategic thinking and analyses of US campaigns. Echevarria discovers that most conceptions of American strategic culture fail to hold up to scrutiny, and that US operational practice has been closer to military science than to military art. Providing a fresh look at how America’s leaders have used military force historically and what that may mean for the future, this book should be of interest to military practitioners and policymakers, students and scholars of military history and security studies, and general readers interested in military history and the future of military power.
Origine de la notice
Abes (SUDOC)

inMedia v4.4